Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 44 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 41 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sam Wormley Board President —
Andrew Forbes Treasurer —
Virginia Folsom Board Member —
Beth Martin Board President —
Mackenzie Rice Board Member —
Janet Baldwin Secretary —
Emily Rehmann Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sam Wormley Board Member —
Andrew Forbes Treasurer —
Aaron Fultz Secretary —
Don Withers Board President —
Virginia Folsom Board Member —
Alan Henson Board Member —
Beth Martin Board Member —
Scott Walker Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sam Wormley Board Member —
Andrew Forbes Treasurer —
Aaron Fultz Secretary —
Don Withers Board President —
Virginia Folsom Board Member —
DeLores Hawkins Board Member —
Alan Henson Board Member —
Beth Martin Board Member —
Scott Walker Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 112 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.