Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 6.2% 46 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — 39.0% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 39.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 42.6% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 42.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 38.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 35.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 37.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 35.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 37.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 33.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 32.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 23.8% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 — — 18.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOM BALLMER EXECUTIVE DI 6.2% of Rev
TALITHA ALLEN Board Member —
HOLLY BHANGOO Board Member —
MATT BRADLEY Board Member —
JOE FRYE Board Member —
LIZ ILES Board Member —
LORI RATTAY Board Member —
JENNIFER SCHLITTER Board Member —
LISA SOIFER Board Member —
PAUL BARTHOLOMEW Board President —
SID BOHLS Secretary —
BRIGID CHRISTIANSON VICE PRESIDE —
SHANNON LERDAL Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOM BALLMER EXEC. DIR. 36.1% of Rev
TOM BALLMER EXEC. DIR. 35.8% of Rev
PAUL BARTHOLOMEW Board President —
DAN GERRIETTS Board President —
BRUCE LONG Board Member —
MATT BRADLEY Board Member —
TAMMY HRUBETZ Treasurer —
SHANNON LERDAL Board Member —
LISA SOIFER Board Member —
SID BOHLS Secretary —
BRIGID CHRISTIANSON Board Member —
BRIAN TREUX Board Member —
PAUL BARTHOLOMEW Board President —
DAN GERRIETTS Board President —
BRUCE LONG Board Member —
MATT BRADLEY Board Member —
TAMMY HRUBETZ Treasurer —
SHANNON LERDAL Board Member —
LISA SOIFER Board Member —
SID BOHLS Secretary —
BRIGID CHRISTIANSON Board Member —
BRIAN TREUX Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOM BALLMER EXEC. DIR. 32.5% of Rev
JASON BULTJE Board President —
BRIAN BAUER Board President —
BRUCE LONG Board Member —
CHRIS HAGER Board Member —
TAMMY HRUBETZ Treasurer —
JAMIE MALEK Board Member —
PAUL BARTHOLOMEW Board Member —
SID BOHLS Secretary —
BRIGID CHRISTIANSON Board Member —
DAN GERRIETTS Board Member —
JEANNE HANSEN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 112 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.