Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEATHER BAGLEY Board President
AUSTIN NEAL Board President
JACOB RAMSEY Treasurer
THERESA NASH Secretary
WILLIAM JAY RAMSEY Board Member
KRISTIN PIKE Executive Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLY CORDRAY Board President
HEATHER BAGLEY Board President
JENNIFER KLYN Treasurer
MARGARET HIBBS Secretary
THERESA NASH Board Member
WILLIAM JAY RAMSEY Board Member
AUSTIN NEAL Board Member
MOLLY TOPF Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 86 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points above the peer median (75 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 55 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.