Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 9.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 8.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 Hidden Hidden 8.1% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 18.6% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 7.8% 48 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 8.8% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 8.8% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 7.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2015 6.2% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 5.6% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 8.0% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 7.2% 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 3.7% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY GILLIGAN Board Member
ANDY BELLINGS Board Member
CHAD WITTHOEFT Board Member
DEBBIE TANCRELL Board President
EDWARD F HENRY Board President
JEFF JOCHUM Treasurer
JENNIFER MOND Board Member
TARA BROCK Board President
KEVIN AHLVIN Board Member
COLIN MUENSTER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY GILLIGAN Board Member
JANET BURROW Board Member
JENNIFER MOND Board Member
ANDY BELLINGS Board Member
JEFF JOCHUM Board Member
CHAD WITTHOEFT Board President
DEBBIE TANCRELL Treasurer
EDWARD F HENRY Board President
TARA BROCK Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 50 over 5 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.