Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 4.3% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 7.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 12.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 9.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 7.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 7.3% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 7.6% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 6.4% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 8.0% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 7.1% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 5.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2012 6.3% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 7.0% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLI LATUSKA Executive Director 8.1% of Rev
MELISSA WINKLER Board President
NICK CAMPANARIO 1ST VICE PRE
TIFFANY DARLING 2ND VICE PRE
JEANNE URBAN Treasurer
MORGAN KOLENDA Secretary
JENNIFER BOYLE Board Member
SUE FUCHS Board Member
JAYME HARTMAN Board Member
BETSY HOLCOMB Board Member
RACHEL INSELMAN Board Member
DERECK MURPHY-WILLIAMS Board Member
HARVEY PLASCH Board Member
EDWARD SCHUMACHER Board Member
ANN-MARIE STOJEVICH Board Member
MAUDE DORNFELD EXECUTIVE DI

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLI LATUSKA EXECUTIVE DI 8.3% of Rev
MELISSA WINKLER Board President
MORGANA KOLENDA 1ST VICE PRE
NICK CAMPANARIO 2ND VICE PRE
JEANNE URBAN Treasurer
DERECK MURPHY-WILLIAMS Secretary
BETSY HOLCOMB Board Member
SUE FUCHS Board Member
JAYME HARTMAN Board Member
EDWARD SCHUMACHER Board Member
ANN-MARIE STOJEVICH Board Member
ELLY SIPROTH Board Member
BRENT BLINDAUER Board Member
HARVEY PLASCH Board Member
TIFFANY DARLING Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLI LATUSKA EXECUTIVE DI 7.1% of Rev
MEL WINKLER Board President
MORGANA KOLENDA 1ST VICE PRE
RACHEL INSELMAN 2ND VICE PRE
BETSY HOLCOMB Secretary
JEANNE URBAN Treasurer
SUE FUCHS Board Member
JAYME HARTMAN Board Member
EDWARD SCHUMACHER Board Member
NICK CAMPANARIO Board Member
ANN-MARIE STOJEVICH Board Member
ELLY SIPROTH Board Member
BRENT BLINDAUER Board Member
DERECK MURPHY-WILLIAMS Board Member
HARVEY PLASCH Board Member
TIFFANY DARLING Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points below the peer median (0 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 35 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.