Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMILLE BUDDECKE PAST PRESIDE
VANESSA CORNETT Vice President
JACOB FITZPATRICK Board President
MEGAN GILLES Treasurer
KATIE JOHNSON Vice President
KATHRYN KARG Vice President
CAROLINE LANGFELD Vice President
JIM LANSING Treasurer
MARY BETH MILLNER Vice President
SARA SMOLENSKY RECORDING SE
TIANYAO XIE Vice President
CAMILLE BUDDECKE Board President
ANN DUHAMEL PAST PRESIDE
MEGAN GILLES Treasurer
LAURA HARDING Board President
DIANE JORDAN Vice President
KATHRYN KARG Vice President
CAROLINE LANGFELD Vice President
JIM LANSING Treasurer
LORI MCCAULEY Vice President
MARY BETH MILLNER Vice President
HELEN MARIE PIOURDE RECORDING SE
DOUG ROHDE Treasurer
DIANA SHAPIRO Vice President
TIANYAO XIE Vice President
JACOB FITZPATRICK PAST PRESIDE
MEGAN GILLES Treasurer
KATIE JOHNSON Vice President
ELSA MATHEWS Vice President
SONJA NAUMANN Treasurer
REBEKAH RICHARDS Vice President
SARA SMOLENSKY RECORDING SE
KAREN STILES Vice President
ALEXANDRA THEIEN Board President
MATTHEW WILSON Vice President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMILLE BUDDECKE Board President
LAURA HARDING Board President
INESE KRIEVANS Vice President
STACY JULSON Vice President
REBECCA NELSON Vice President
JACOB FITZPATRICK Treasurer
DR NICHOLAS SUSI Vice President
DOUG ROHDE Treasurer
DR SARA LANGMEAD Secretary
ERIN WINCHELL Vice President
KATHRYN KARG Vice President
LORI MCCAULEY Vice President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NANCY VAN KAMPEN Vice President
CAMILLE BUDDECKE Board President
DR ANN DUHAMEL Board President
INESE KRIEVANS Vice President
DOUG ROHDE Vice President
BARBARA KENNEDY Vice President
JACOB FITZPATRICK Treasurer
DR NICHOLAS SUSI Vice President
SIRI CALTVEDT Vice President
LAURA HARDING Treasurer
DR SARA LANGMEAD Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.