Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 56 Fragile Recovery
2022 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 44.8% 35 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 41.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 24.3% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2014 51.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 60.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 19.7% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 16.8% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROMA CALATAYUD-STOCKS Board President
MARY SUMNERS Board President
LINDA BARTLING Treasurer
CONNIE SOMMERS Secretary
MILA EKLUND Board President
BRENT REICHERT Board Member
SANDY REICHERT Board Member
SUSAN MILTEER Board Member
LAUREN FICHTEL-HEWITT Board Member
MEG GISSLEN Board Member
LISA ROEHL Board Member
MARY ELLA PRATTE Board Member
LESLIE DAVIS NIEMOELLER Board Member
AARON BROWN Board Member
ANN FARRELL Board Member
ANNA LAMB Board Member
PATRICIA RICE Board Member
JESSICA ROSE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRENT REICHERT DIRECTORS OF DEVELOPMENT
SANDY REICHERT DIRECTORS OF DEVELOPMENT
CAROL BOSSMAN Board Member
CINDY OLMANSON Board President
DAVID DAVIS Board Member
EMILY CLAUSMAN Board Member
IRENE SUDDARD Treasurer
JULIE CRAVEN Board Member
KELSEY DODSON-SMITH Board Member
KRISTIE NELSON-NEUHAUS Board Member
LAUREN FICHTEL Board Member
LINDA BARTLING Board Member
LISA ROEHL Board Member
LUDMILA EKLUND Board Member
MELISSA OUSLEY Board Member
MICHELLE WOOD Board Member
SHERI TAMTE Board Member
VICKI BRUNSVOLD Secretary
VICKI BUNKER Board Member
WADE HAUSER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LUDMILA EKLUND Board Member
VICKI BRUNSVOLD Secretary
LISA ROEHL Board Member
CAROL BOSSMAN Board Member
CINDY OLMANSON Board President
IRENE SUDDARD Treasurer
SHERI TAMTE Board Member
LAUREN FICHTEL Board Member
NICK KOCK Board Member
BECKY ODLAND Board Member
VICKI BUNKER Board Member
ANGELA MCKEAND Board Member
MELISSA OUSLEY Board Member
DEB DILLAWAY Board Member
WADE HAUSER Board Member
KATHY VIGIL Board Member
MARY ELLA PRATTE Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARY ELLA PRATTE Board President
LUDMILA EKLUND Board Member
LINDA BARTLING Treasurer
VICKI BRUNSVOLD Secretary
PAMELA ARNSTEIN MUSICIAN LIASON
KATHERINE ROEPKE Board Member
LISA ROEHL Board Member
JOANNA CORTRIGHT Board Member
KATHERINE GALLIGAN Board Member
BRIAN KIDWELL Board Member
KATHY VIGIL Board Member
KATY MIKETIC Board Member
CAROL BOSSMAN Board Member
NICH KOCH Board Member
BECKY ODLAND Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (60 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.