Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 28.0% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 30.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 45 Fragile Recovery
2010 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2009 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HANNAH ZIMMERLING Board Member 16.2% of Rev
BETHANY BAILEY Board Member 16.2% of Rev
ELIZABETH KEARNEY Board President
ERIC WOLLAN Treasurer
LAUREN ROTH Board Member
AMANDA GUSTAFSON Board Member
DEBORAH ROSEN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARY K BAHUS-MEYER EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 27.0% of Rev
ELIZABETH KEARNEY Board President
DEBORAH L OSTER Treasurer
LAUREN ROTH Board Member
AMANDA GUSTAFSON Board Member
LORI MORALES Board Member
NICOLE JENKINS Board Member
RENEE BOBIAN Board Member
DIANA AINSWORTH Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORY OHS Secretary 8.4% of Rev
GABRIELLE SCOTT Executive Director 3.2% of Rev
ELIZABETH KEARNEY Board President
DEBORAH L OSTER Treasurer
LAUREN ROTH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 36 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 11 points above the peer median (50 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.