Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
39
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 21.1% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 12.2% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 18.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 13.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 9.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 11.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 11.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 10.8% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 10.8% 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 13.6% 37 Fragile Recovery
2013 13.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 12.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2011 14.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joel Sass Executive Dir. 22.7% of Rev
Stephen Noyes Board President
John Buttolph Board President
Daniel Pinkerton Secretary
Steve Boland Treasurer
Jean Morrison Board Member
Marissa McDowell Board Member
Virginia Sutton Board Member
Katie Schmieg Miller Board Member
Temma Shankman Board Member
Rick Cousins Board Member
Ellie Skelton Board Member
Mollie O'Connor Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joel Sass Executive Dir. 21.1% of Rev
Libby Lincoln Board Member
John Buttolph Board President
Dan Pinkerton Secretary
Stephen Noyes Board President
Ellie Skelton Board Member
Jean Morrison Board Member
Virginia Sutton Board Member
Steve Boland Treasurer
Marissa McDowell Board Member
Temma Shankman Board Member
Richard Ericson Board Member
Richard Cousins Board Member
Katie Schmieg Miller Board Member
Char Mason Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joel Sass Executive Dir. 16.1% of Rev
Libby Lincoln Board President
John Buttolph Board President
Dan Pinkerton Secretary
Susan Haas Board Member
Michael Haney Board Member
Jean Morrison Board Member
Ginny Sutton Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Elizabeth Lincoln Board President
John Buttolph Treasurer
Dan Pinkerton Secretary
Joel Sass Artistic Director
Susan Haas Board Member
Renee Harberts Board Member
Michael Haney Board Member
Jean Morrison Board Member
Virginia Sutton Board Member
Amy Warner Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Haas Executive Dir. 7.8% of Rev
Michael Sommers Board Member 1.2% of Rev
Keith Lester Board President
Dan Pinkerton Secretary
Charlie Vanek Treasurer
John Buttolph Board Member
Craig Harris Board Member
Elizabeth Lincoln Board Member
Dr Susan Schaefer Board Member
Ginny Sutton Board Member
Amy Warner Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.