Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 47 Fragile Recovery
2023 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 61 Stable Stable Watch
2020 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Beth Corning Board President
Kristin Garbarino Board President
Heidi Nagle Treasurer
Heather Lemley Esq Board Member
Melinda Pietrusza Board Member
Marianne Szegedy Maszak Board Member
Veronica Ramallo Esq Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (55 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.