Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 44 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUANITA BLACKHAWK | Board President | — | ||
| JANELL VIRCKS | Secretary | — | ||
| ARLANA VAUGHAN | Executive Director | — | ||
| PEG THOMAS | MBER AT LRG | — | ||
| AL MCFARLANE | Board Member | — | ||
| MARIO LEE | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA CRAWFORD | Board Member | — | ||
| PETER QUINN | Board Member | — | ||
| HOWARD KLEYMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| DR PAULETTE SANKOFA | Board Member | — | ||
| NATALIE JOHNSON LEE | Board Member | — | ||
| DR VIDA PESKAY | Board Member | — | ||
| LINDA LUCAS | Board Member | — | ||
| LIZ BROWN | Board Member | — | ||
| TERRI RICCI | Board Member | — | ||
| DEBRA WATTS | Board Member | — | ||
| DR BILL BANFIELD | Board Member | — | ||
| CHARLEEN BACIGALUPO | Board Member | — | ||
| CHAR THOMPSON | Board Member | — | ||
| DR CYNTHIA PHILLIPS | Board Member | — | ||
| PRESTON JOHNSON | Board Member | — | ||
| MARCIA FOUTCH | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 41 → 41 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.