Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 17.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 19.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 16.9% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 18.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 17.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 18.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 19.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 17.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 20.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 19.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 20.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 22.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 25.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARBARA BROOKS Artistic Director 17.4% of Rev
MARK APPELBAUM Board Member
RENAE GOLDMAN Secretary
GAIL BENDER SATZ Board Member
VICTORIA DEL CAMPO Board Member
ELLERY JULY Treasurer
ALEX TSELOS Board President
ELLEN SAMPSON Board Member
AMY NEWMAN Board President
SUSAN ROBINER Board Member
TAMMY MAKRAM Board Member
SETH MEISLER Board Member
TJ PIERRET Board Member
ANDREW AOKI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.