Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 23.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 17.2% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 29.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 26.9% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 35.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 18.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 21.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 23.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 7.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 11.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 17.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 20.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 23.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 19.1% of Rev
ANDREW GOOD ARTISITIC PRODUCTION
JAY BECK Board President
JODI MELIUS Board President
JOSEPH MISH Board Member
MARK NEVILLE Board Member
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary
MATT ROISUM Treasurer
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member
ORIN LARSON Board Member
AMY ANDREWS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 16.1% of Rev
JERE LANTZ Artistic Director 13.4% of Rev
ANDREW GOOD Artistic Director
BRAD KREHBIEL Board President
BRUCE ROHDE Board Member
JAMES SLOAN Board Member
JAY BECK Board President
JODI MELIUS Board President
JOSEPH MISH Board Member
MARK NEVILLE Board Member
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary
MATT ROISUM Treasurer
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JERE LANTZ Executive Director 22.4% of Rev
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 14.0% of Rev
ANDREW GOOD ARTISITIC PRODUCTION
BRAD KREHBIEL Board President
BRUCE ROHDE Board Member
JAMES SLOAN Board Member
JAY BECK Board Member
JODI MELIUS Board Member
JOSEPH MISH Board Member
MARION KLEINBERG Board Member
MARK NEVILLE Board Member
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary
MATT ROISUM Treasurer
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JERE LANTZ Executive Director 30.8% of Rev
AMY LINDSTROM Executive Director 11.1% of Rev
RAFAEL JIMENEZ Board Member
MARION KLEINBERG Board Member
BRUCE ROHDE Board Member
JAMES SLOAN Board Member
GLENN FORBES Board Member
JODI MELIUS Board Member
JOSEPH MISH Board Member
MARK NEVILLE Board Member
SARAH SCHAEFER MEIER Board Member
BRENT TUNIS Board Member
MATT ROISUM Treasurer
MARY BETH SANCOMB-MORAN Secretary
JAY BECK Board President
BRAD KREHBIEL Board President
ANDREW GOOD ARTISITIC PRODUCTION
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (15 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.