Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 8.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 — — 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE FORDERER Board Member —
MONI HARPER Board President —
EMILY HEINIS Board Member —
DEVON LAWRENCE Board Member —
TRICIA LEWIS Board Member —
MICHAEL LOOFT Secretary —
RANDY MEDIGER PAST PRESIDE —
KJERSTIN MOODY Board Member —
KERRY NAGEL-ALLEN Board Member —
GABRIELA ROEMHILDT Board Member —
SANDY SUNDE Board Member —
DAVE WAHL Board Member —
MARK WAMMA Board President —
KOREY WOODLEY Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOM DAVID BARNA Secretary —
CAROLYN BORGEN Board Member —
JULIE FORDERER Board Member —
KRISTIE GAALSWYK-POMERENKE Board Member —
MONI HARPER Board Member —
DEVON LAWRENCE Board Member —
MICHAEL LOOFT Board Member —
APRIL MALPHURS PAST PRESIDE —
RANDY MEDIGER Board President —
SANDY SUNDE Board Member —
DAVE WAHL Board Member —
MARK WAMMA Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE DAVIS Board President —
KRISTIE GAALSWYK-POMERENKE Board Member —
DIANA JOSEPH Board Member —
TERESA KONECHNE Board Member —
KAREN KRAUSE Board Member —
APRIL MALPHURS Board Member —
LIZ MILLER Board Member —
LARRY PINT Board Member —
RITA RASSBACH Secretary —
DANA SIKKILA Board Member —
CAROL SOMA VICE PRESIDE —
BETH STEFFL Board Member —
GINNY WALTERS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 30 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (15 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.