Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
24
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 24.5% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 52.8% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 15.7% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 22.2% 53 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 0.6% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 10.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 10.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 13.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 10.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 10.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 20.5% 16 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 8.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 12.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ben Krywosz Artistic Director 23.8% of Rev
Kate Hujda Board Member 0.6% of Rev
Sarah Johnson Board Member
Tina Meckel Secretary
James Payne Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ben Krywosz Artistic Director 22.1% of Rev
Kate Hujda Board Member
Sarah Johnson Treasurer
Tina Meckel Secretary
James Payne Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ben Krywosz Artistic Director 21.4% of Rev
Kate Hujda Board Member 0.4% of Rev
Sarah Johnson Treasurer
Tina Meckel Secretary
James Payne Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ben Krywosz Artistic Director 21.4% of Rev
Kate Hujda Board Member 0.5% of Rev
Kate Hujda Board Member
Sarah Johnson Treasurer
Tina Meckel Secretary
James Payne Board President
Sarah Johnson Treasurer
Tina Meckel Secretary
James Payne Board President
Ben Krywosz Artistic Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (15 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.