Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 61 Stable Stable Watch
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 57 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melinda Ruzich Board President
Becca Gouldin Board President
Amanda Heye Secretary
Cassie Belak Treasurer
Megan Bellefy Board Member
Alecia Johnson Board Member
Rachel Atkinson Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melinda Ruzich Board President
Becca Gouldin Board President
Denise Massich Secretary
Cassie Belak Treasurer
Doreen Simme Board Member
Amanda Heye Board Member
Megan Bellety Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jessica Rikkola Secretary
Julie Jones Treasurer
Bridget Maki Board Member
Denise Massich Board Member
Jessica Hendrickson Board Member
Rich Puhek Board President
Jen Forer Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 8 points above the peer median (45 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.