Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
47
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.0% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 3.3% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 7.5% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 8.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 1.1% 44 Fragile Recovery
2017 1.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 6.8% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 1.3% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 11.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 7.8% 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 11.5% 37 Fragile Recovery
2011 9.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE DI 7.9% of Rev
MELANIE ABRAHAM Board Member
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member
JAMIE JENNISSEN Board Member
MIKE JENSEN Board Member
MAGGIE JONES Board Member
DAVID PHILLIPS Board Member
EMILY STROBEL Board Member
EMILY WINN Board Member
DAVID HARINEN Treasurer
JOHN JACOBSON VICE PRESIDE
KEEGAN JONES Board President
ZACKERY KNAPTON Secretary

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE DI 8.0% of Rev
MELANIE ABRAHAM Board Member
DAVID HARINEN Board Member
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member
JAMIE JENNISSEN Board Member
KEEGAN JONES Board Member
MAGGIE JONES Board Member
VIDETTE OSTERMEIER Board Member
EMILY WINN Board Member
JOHN JACOBSON Treasurer
ZACKERY KNAPTON Secretary
DAVID PHILLIPS Board President
REBECCA SOMERS VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE SE 6.3% of Rev
BEV CASHMAN Board Member
EMMA HELLEVIK Board Member
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member
JOHN JACOBSON Board Member
ZACKERY KNAPTON Board Member
PATRICK MCCOLLEY Board Member
REBECCA SOMERS Board Member
KRISTI WESTERGAARD Board Member
CURT JORGENSEN Treasurer
VIDETTE OSTERMEIER Board President
DAVID PHILLIPS VICE PRESIDE
JUDY SCHMIDT Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE SE 7.0% of Rev
HEATHER BURKE Secretary
BEV CASHMAN Board Member
SARAH FRIESEN Board Member
EMMA HELLEVIK Board Member
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member
NAOMI JIRELE Board Member
PATRICK MCCOLLEY Board Member
DAVID PHILLIPS Board Member
JUDY SCHMIDT Board Member
CURT JORGENSEN Treasurer
VIDETTE OSTERMEIER VICE PRESIDE
KRISTI WESTERGAARD Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points above the peer median (50 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.