Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.0% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 3.3% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 7.5% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 8.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 1.1% 44 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 1.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 6.8% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 1.3% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 11.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 7.8% 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 11.5% 37 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 9.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE DI 7.9% of Rev
MELANIE ABRAHAM Board Member —
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member —
JAMIE JENNISSEN Board Member —
MIKE JENSEN Board Member —
MAGGIE JONES Board Member —
DAVID PHILLIPS Board Member —
EMILY STROBEL Board Member —
EMILY WINN Board Member —
DAVID HARINEN Treasurer —
JOHN JACOBSON VICE PRESIDE —
KEEGAN JONES Board President —
ZACKERY KNAPTON Secretary —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE DI 8.0% of Rev
MELANIE ABRAHAM Board Member —
DAVID HARINEN Board Member —
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member —
JAMIE JENNISSEN Board Member —
KEEGAN JONES Board Member —
MAGGIE JONES Board Member —
VIDETTE OSTERMEIER Board Member —
EMILY WINN Board Member —
JOHN JACOBSON Treasurer —
ZACKERY KNAPTON Secretary —
DAVID PHILLIPS Board President —
REBECCA SOMERS VICE PRESIDE —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE SE 6.3% of Rev
BEV CASHMAN Board Member —
EMMA HELLEVIK Board Member —
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member —
JOHN JACOBSON Board Member —
ZACKERY KNAPTON Board Member —
PATRICK MCCOLLEY Board Member —
REBECCA SOMERS Board Member —
KRISTI WESTERGAARD Board Member —
CURT JORGENSEN Treasurer —
VIDETTE OSTERMEIER Board President —
DAVID PHILLIPS VICE PRESIDE —
JUDY SCHMIDT Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICTORIA BARTKOWIAK EXECUTIVE SE 7.0% of Rev
HEATHER BURKE Secretary —
BEV CASHMAN Board Member —
SARAH FRIESEN Board Member —
EMMA HELLEVIK Board Member —
JEFFREY JACKSON Board Member —
NAOMI JIRELE Board Member —
PATRICK MCCOLLEY Board Member —
DAVID PHILLIPS Board Member —
JUDY SCHMIDT Board Member —
CURT JORGENSEN Treasurer —
VIDETTE OSTERMEIER VICE PRESIDE —
KRISTI WESTERGAARD Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 6 points below the peer median (55 vs. 61).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.