Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 13.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — 14.5% 41 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 22.2% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 12.3% 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 18.2% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 12.9% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 12.5% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 12.6% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 9.8% 54 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 15.5% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 — — 12.8% 46 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 11.7% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.9% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARISA NETTERLUND Executive Director 13.2% of Rev
AIDAN GALLIVAN Board Member —
VAMENG MOUA Board Member —
JAMES VOGEL Board Member —
ROBERT J SMITH Board Member —
BILL LARSEN Board Member —
ELIJAH SAIGER Board Member —
ZOLA ROSENFELD Board Member —
DAVID STEVENS Board Member —
MARK WEBB Board Member —
DOMINIC DETWILER Board Member —
GEORGE ROESLER Board Member —
HUZEFA GANDHI Board Member —
LAURA DOTY Board Member —
JENNIE WARD Board Member —
CARRIE ANDERSON Board President —
ANGELA YOUNGDAHL Board President —
PATRICIA GAGE Secretary —
PAUL CLAUSEN Treasurer —
JAMES ARNOLD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carrie Andersen Board Member —
James Arnold Board Member —
Chad Carr Board Member —
Betsy Lofgren Board Member —
Jean Shore Board Member —
Dann Peterson Board Member —
VaMeng Moua Board Member —
Aidan Gallivan Board Member —
Linda Paulsen Secretary —
Paul Clausen Treasurer —
Sadie Ward Board President —
David Stevens Board President —
James Arnold Board Member —
Patricia Gage Board Member —
Aidan Gallivan Board Member —
Christopher Kradle Board Member —
VaMeng Moua Board Member —
Elizabeth Lofgren Board Member —
Jennie Ward Board Member —
Dann Peterson Board Member —
Jean Shore Board Member —
Angela Youngdahl Board Member —
James Vogel Board Member —
David Stevens Board President —
Carrie Andersen Board President —
Linda Paulsen Secretary —
Paul Clausen Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carrie Anderson Board Member —
Howard Ansel Board Member —
James Arnold Board Member —
Chad Carr Board Member —
Garry Geiken Board Member —
Dann Peterson Board Member —
Betsy Lofgren Board Member —
Stephanie Long Board Member —
VaMeng Moua Board Member —
Jean Shore Board Member —
Samuel Joseph Board Member —
Shona Ramchandani Board Member —
Linda Paulsen Secretary —
Paul Clausen Treasurer —
Sadie Ward Board President —
David Stevens Board President —
Aidan Gallivan Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.