Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 6.6% 40 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 17.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 6.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 7.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 9.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 7.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 7.8% of Rev
LINDSEY DUOOS WILLIAMS Artistic Director 6.4% of Rev
JACLYN JUNE JOHNSON Board Member 1.7% of Rev
LARRY SINAK Treasurer —
PAUL MCCARTAN Board President —
LAURA QUEST Secretary —
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President —
ERIC DECKER Board Member —
DEBBIE FUEHRER Board Member —
RAQUEL HELLMAN Board Member —
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President —
JUDY HICKEY Board Member —
PAUL MCCARTAN Board President —
ROSILYN STEINKAMP Board Member —
LARRY SINAK Treasurer —
RAQUEL HELLMAN Secretary —
MISSY HAGEN Board Member —
LAUREL PODULKE-SMITH Board Member —
JUDY HICKEY Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 7.1% of Rev
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President —
MISSY HAGEN Board President —
LARRY SINAK Treasurer —
LAUREL PODULKE Secretary —
RAQUEL HELLMAN Board Member —
PAUL MCCARTAN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 3.0% of Rev
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President —
MISSY HAGEN Board President —
LARRY SINAK Treasurer —
LAUREL PODULKE Secretary —
RAQUEL HELLMAN Board Member —
PAUL MCCARTAN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEVIN MILLER RESIGNED Executive Director 7.3% of Rev
MISHA JOHNSON Board Member 0.7% of Rev
ARI KOLAS RESIGNED Treasurer —
JEFF HAYNES RESIGNED Secretary —
KAY HOCKER RESIGNED Board President —
GINGER ROBERTS CARSON Board Member —
JERRY KVASNICKA RESIGNED Board Member —
DEBI NEVILLE Board Member —
CHAD CAMPBELL RESIGNED Board Member —
GREG GENTLING RESIGNED Board Member —
BARI AMADIO RESIGNED Board Member —
BECCA STILES-NOGOSEK RESIGNED Board Member —
JEAN MARVIN RESIGNED Board Member —
DIANNA PARKS RESIGNED Board Member —
BRADLEY HERR RESIGNED Board Member —
EMILY WATKINS Board President —
MELISSA ADAMS-GOIHL Board President —
ANNIE LANDKAMMER Treasurer —
MISSY HAGEN Secretary —
LAWRENCE SINAK Board Member —
KAMI SIM Board Member —
LAUREL PODULKE-SMITH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.