Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
19
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 31.0% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 19.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 32.2% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 26.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 13.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 42 Fragile Recovery
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM BUSCH Executive Director 31.0% of Rev
JOE CIANCAGALINI Board President
KATHRYN LOMANSEY Board President
ANNE PLICHTA Secretary
ROSS BUKOURICZ Treasurer
WILLIAM ANDERSON Board Member
REBECCA BELVILLE Board Member
SYLVIA DIEDRICH Board Member
JARED GREANYA Board Member
CAROL GREIF SCHUELE Board Member
OLIVER JOHNSON Board Member
ERIN LEVZOW Board Member
MORIAH PIERCE Board Member
KELLY SCHLICHT Board Member
JAMEELAH SHAREEF Board Member
ELIZABETH DANNECKER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM BUSCH Executive Director 31.0% of Rev
JOE CIANCAGALINI Board President
KELLY SCHLICHT Board President
ANNE PLICHTA Secretary
ROSS BUKOURICZ Treasurer
WILLIAM ANDERSON Board Member
ELIZABETH DANNECKER Board Member
SYLVIA DIEDRICH Board Member
CAROL GREIF SCHUELE Board Member
OLIVER JOHNSON Board Member
ERIN LEVZOW Board Member
KATHRYN LOMANSEY Board Member
MORIAH PIERCE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYNN SWANSON Executive Director 24.1% of Rev
WILLIAM BUSCH Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
JOE CIANCAGALINI Board President
BRENDA DUKE Board President
ANNE PLICHTA Secretary
ROSS BUKOURICZ Treasurer
TOM BAGWELL Board Member
KATHRYN LOMANSEY Board Member
EMILY SCHLEY Board Member
JACLYN STOCZANYN Board Member
JENNIFER OHLENDORF Board Member
BRENDA DUKE Board Member
NKENGE KIRTON Board Member
DARIN JANECEK Board Member
KELSEY NUGENT Board Member
ANNE PLICHTA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 104 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (5 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~18 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.