Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
19
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 31.0% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 19.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 32.2% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 26.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 — — 13.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM BUSCH Executive Director 31.0% of Rev
JOE CIANCAGALINI Board President —
KATHRYN LOMANSEY Board President —
ANNE PLICHTA Secretary —
ROSS BUKOURICZ Treasurer —
WILLIAM ANDERSON Board Member —
REBECCA BELVILLE Board Member —
SYLVIA DIEDRICH Board Member —
JARED GREANYA Board Member —
CAROL GREIF SCHUELE Board Member —
OLIVER JOHNSON Board Member —
ERIN LEVZOW Board Member —
MORIAH PIERCE Board Member —
KELLY SCHLICHT Board Member —
JAMEELAH SHAREEF Board Member —
ELIZABETH DANNECKER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM BUSCH Executive Director 31.0% of Rev
JOE CIANCAGALINI Board President —
KELLY SCHLICHT Board President —
ANNE PLICHTA Secretary —
ROSS BUKOURICZ Treasurer —
WILLIAM ANDERSON Board Member —
ELIZABETH DANNECKER Board Member —
SYLVIA DIEDRICH Board Member —
CAROL GREIF SCHUELE Board Member —
OLIVER JOHNSON Board Member —
ERIN LEVZOW Board Member —
KATHRYN LOMANSEY Board Member —
MORIAH PIERCE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYNN SWANSON Executive Director 24.1% of Rev
WILLIAM BUSCH Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
JOE CIANCAGALINI Board President —
BRENDA DUKE Board President —
ANNE PLICHTA Secretary —
ROSS BUKOURICZ Treasurer —
TOM BAGWELL Board Member —
KATHRYN LOMANSEY Board Member —
EMILY SCHLEY Board Member —
JACLYN STOCZANYN Board Member —
JENNIFER OHLENDORF Board Member —
BRENDA DUKE Board Member —
NKENGE KIRTON Board Member —
DARIN JANECEK Board Member —
KELSEY NUGENT Board Member —
ANNE PLICHTA Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
19 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points below the peer median (5 vs. 56).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~18 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.