Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.8% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 6.3% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 4.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 3.0% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 7.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 8.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 9.1% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAREY ZAWLOCKI Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
FALICIA HINES Board President
JP CROAKE Treasurer
LUCY GREIMEL Secretary
SARAH BAHAUDDIN Board Member
RACHEL ELLETT Board Member
RYANN FOELKER Board Member
EMILY GRIFFITH Board Member
JEN GUNDRY Board Member
ANN MCDERMOTT Board Member
LINDSEY PEETERS Board Member
RALPH RUSSO Board Member
SEEP PALIWAL Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAREY ZAWLOCKI Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
MEGHAN KRAUSE Board President
MEGAN PURTELL Board President
EMILY BALSLEY Board Member
EVE GALANTER Board Member
RACHEL WERNER Board Member
LUCY GREIMEL Board Member
JP CROAKE Board Member
RALPH RUSSO Board Member
CHUCK BAUER Board Member
SEEP PALIWAL Board Member
ANN MCDERMOTT Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAREY ZAWLOCKI Executive Director 2.4% of Rev
MEGHAN KRAUSE Board President
MEGAN PURTELL Board President
RALPH RUSSO Treasurer
EMILY BALSLEY Board Member
EVE GALANTER Board Member
RACHEL WERNER Board Member
LUCY GREIMEL Board Member
JP CROAKE Board Member
CHUCK BAUER Board Member
SEEP PALIWAL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MONICA WAHLBERG THRU MAY Executive Director 5.9% of Rev
JULIA KERR Board President
MEGAN PURTELL Board President
COLLEEN CARMONA Treasurer
EMILY BALSLEY Board Member
EVE GALANTER Board Member
THERESA MCARDLE Board Member
DANA SCHECKEL Board Member
MEGHAN KRAUSE Board Member
MCKENZIE GLYN-ZDRALE Board Member
JP CROAKE Board Member
RALPH RUSSO Board Member
CHUCK BAUER Board Member
CAREY ZAWLOCKI BEG JUNE Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 20 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.