Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
39
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 23.1% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 14.6% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 9.3% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 14.0% 41 Fragile Recovery
2019 22.2% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 18.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 10.5% 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 21.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 19.7% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSIAH TROPP Executive Director 23.1% of Rev
ZAK STOWE Board President
BONNIE BALKE Treasurer
MICHAEL DONNELLY Secretary
BOB MOORE Board Member
STEPHANIE MONDAY Board President
JAMES VAN ABEL Board Member
JASON COMPTON Secretary
STEVE NOLL Board Member
JULIA HOUCK Board Member
TAYLOR HARTMAN STRPKO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIRK STANTIS Executive Director 8.2% of Rev
JOSIAH TROPP Executive Director
ZAK STOWE Board President
SEAN LANGENECKER Board President
JAMES CHILINO Secretary
BONNIE BALKE Treasurer
MICHAEL DONNELLY Board Member
JONATHAN SOLARI Board Member
BOB MOORE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIRK STANTIS Executive Director 10.7% of Rev
ZAK STOWE Board President
SEAN LANGENECKER Board President
JAMES CHIOLINO Secretary
BONNIE BALKE Treasurer
MICHAEL DONNELLY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIRK STANTIS Executive Director 22.8% of Rev
MICHAEL DONNELLY Board President
STEVE NOLL Board President
JIM CHILINO Secretary
BONNIE BALKE Treasurer
JOHNATHAN SOLARI Board Member
DONNOVAN MOEN Board Member
ZAK STOWE Board Member
JAN LEVINE THAL Board Member
SEAN LANGENECKER Board Member
MICHELLE DAYTON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 12 points below the peer median (40 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 23.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.