Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 12.5% 53 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — 20.6% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 5.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 17.4% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 18.2% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 11.1% 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 16.5% 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 20.4% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 — — 18.9% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROL ZIEHMKE Board President —
KERRY LECHNER Board Member —
ROBERT FENSKE Treasurer —
LAURA JOHNSON Board Member —
TAMMY SMITH Board Member —
BEATRIZ SOMOZA Board Member —
SANDY GUNDERSON Board Member —
SAMUEL CLEMMONS Board President —
BETH EDMONDSON Board Member —
BARBARA CHURCH Board Member —
JENN CZECHOLINSKI Board Member —
CHRISTINE COLE Board Member —
BRENDA BLOHM Board Member —
MELODY BROOKS TAYLOR Secretary —
SHERIL LANNOYE Board Member —
HEIDI ROYAL Executive Dir. —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEIDI ROYAL Executive Dir. 13.0% of Rev
CAROL ZIEHMKE Board President —
DOROTHY REBHOLZ Secretary —
ROBERT FENSKE Treasurer —
LAURA JOHNSON Board President —
TAMMY SMITH Board Member —
ELIZABETH KUTZKE Board Member —
SANDY GUNDERSON Board Member —
SAMUEL CLEMMONS Board Member —
BETH EDMONDSON Board Member —
BARBARA CHURCH Board Member —
HOLLY POWERS Board Member —
ELLEN SCHIEBER Board Member —
COLLEEN MURPHY Board Member —
MELODY BROOKS TAYLOR Board Member —
SHERIL LANNOYE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEIDI ROYAL Executive Dir. 12.4% of Rev
CAROL ZIEHMKE Board Member —
DOROTHY REBHOLZ Secretary —
ROBERT FENSKE Treasurer —
TAMMY SMITH Board Member —
ELIZABETH KUTZKE Board Member —
SANDY GUNDERSON Board Member —
SAMUEL CLEMMONS Board Member —
BARBARA CHURCH Board Member —
HOLLY POWERS Board Member —
ELLEN SCHIEBER Board Member —
COLLEEN MURPHY Board Member —
MELODY BROOKS TAYLOR Board President —
SHERIL LANNOYE Board Member —
LAURA JOHNSON Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEIDI ROYAL Executive Dir. 12.4% of Rev
CAROL ZIEHMKE Board Member —
DOROTHY REBHOLZ Secretary —
ROBERT FENSKE Treasurer —
TAMMY SMITH Board Member —
ELIZABETH KUTZKE Board Member —
SANDY GUNDERSON Board Member —
CRAIG RADI Board Member —
BARBARA CHURCH Board Member —
DENNIS DORN Board Member —
HOLLY POWERS Board Member —
ELLEN SCHIEBER Board Member —
SEAN MALONE Board Member —
COLLEEN MURPHY Board Member —
MELODY BROOKS TAYLOR Board President —
SHERIL LANNOYE Board Member —
THOMAS WEISENBERGER Board Member —
LAURA JOHNSON Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.