Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

"Provides financial and logistical support for the Pulaski School District's music programs, including scholarships and funding for special events like the Tournament of Roses trip."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA PUYLEART Treasurer
REBECCA OLLMANN Secretary
NICOLE LOVE Board President
JEFF MOMMAERTS Board President
D THOMAS BUSCH Board Member
MIKE GUERERRO Board Member
KATHY BROWN Board Member
MINDY MELENDY Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HELEN SEILTZ Treasurer
RACHEL CHENEY Secretary
KELLI BIRK Board President
MARGARET WINKELMAN Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in WI for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.