Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
35
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 19.4% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 8.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2021 19.4% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 13.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 9.8% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 8.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2017 61 Stable Decline Risk
2016 65 Stable Stable Watch
2015 65 Stable Stable Watch
2014 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 61 Stable Stable Watch
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISSNER Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
DALE DAHL Board Member
JOHN GETHERS Board Member
GALE JACKSON Board Member
JEN LUDWICZAK Board Member
JOYCE REJRET Board Member
DIANE SCHROEDER Board Member
SHELLY SMOLAREK Board Member
ROBERTA STEWARD Board President
WENDY ERON Board Member
PETE ROGOSKI Treasurer
JAN FISHER Secretary
SUE AKEY Board Member
BARB ANDERSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISNER EXECUTIVE DI 10.6% of Rev
WENDY ERON Board President
JAN FISHER Board Member
BARB HERREID Secretary
JOHN KUEHL Board Member
PETE ROGOSKI Board Member
LISA SKIBBA Board Member
NANCY SKORCZEWSKI Board Member
ROBERTA STEWART Board Member
CRAIG TIMM Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISNER Executive Director 10.6% of Rev
ROBERTA STEWART Board Member
CAL KAUFMAN Treasurer
BARB HERREID Secretary
WENDY ERON Board President
JIM LUCAS Board Member
LISA SKIBBA Board Member
NANCY SKORCZEWSKI Board Member
NATHANIEL SPRINGER Board Member
PAM MCCARVILLE Board President
CRAIG TIMM Board Member
LEE STEINHILBER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SALLY KISNER Executive Director 9.1% of Rev
ROBERTA STEWART Board Member
CAL KAUFMAN Treasurer
BARB HERREID Secretary
WENDY ERON Board President
JIM LUCAS Board Member
ERIC BRITTNACHER Board Member
NANCY SKORCZEWSKI Board Member
TED MOSKONAS Board Member
PAM MCCARVILLE Board President
CONNIE SOUBA Board Member
LEE STEINHILBER Board Member
JOHN VAN DE LOOP Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 20 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points below the peer median (25 vs. 49).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.