Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 8.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 16.8% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 15.8% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.9% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 13.8% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 5.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 12.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 9.5% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 7.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 10.9% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 9.9% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 11.8% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 11.6% 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marie Fritz Perry Executive Director 8.1% of Rev
Carrie Blum Board Member —
Janelle Massey Board Member —
Jane Monahan Board Member —
Dan Wegmueller Board Member —
Jane Sybers Board Member —
Hans Bernet Board Member —
Ryan Ziltner Board Member —
Christine Wellington Board President —
Mike Sanders Board President —
Julie Wilke Treasurer —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 8.3% of Rev
Carrie Blum Board Member —
Janelle Massey Board Member —
Kathy Hennessy Executive Dir. —
Robert Rudd Board Member —
Jane Monahan Board Member —
Dan Wegmueller Board Member —
Jane Sybers Board Member —
Hans Bernet Board Member —
Ryan Ziltner Board Member —
Christine Wellington Board President —
Mike Sanders Board President —
Julie Wilke Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
Christine Wellington Board Member —
Rebecca Gilman Board Member —
Wendy Weiler Erb Board Member —
Greg Fedders Secretary —
Kathy Hennessy Executive Dir. —
Robert Rudd Board Member —
Mike Sanders Board Member —
Dan Wegmueller Board Member —
Hans Bernet Board Member —
Julie Buchanan Board Member —
Marc Farmer Board Member —
Ryan Ziltner Board Member —
Kevin Callahan Board President —
John Baumann Board President —
Julie Wilke Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 7.6% of Rev
Christine Wellington Board Member —
Rebecca Gilman Board Member —
Wendy Weiler Erb Board Member —
Greg Fedders Secretary —
Kathy Hennessy Executive Dir. —
Robert Rudd Board Member —
Mike Sanders Board Member —
Dan Wegmueller Board Member —
Hans Bernet Board Member —
Julie Buchanan Board Member —
Marc Farmer Board Member —
Ryan Ziltner Board Member —
Kevin Callahan Board President —
John Baumann Board President —
Julie Wilke Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kathy Hennessy Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Mary Soddy Board Member —
Wendy Weiler Erb Board Member —
Christine Wellington Board President —
Ryan Ziltner Board Member —
Rebecca Gilman Board Member —
Kevin Callahan Board President —
John Baumann Board President —
Julie Wilke Treasurer —
Sue Barrett Board Member —
Hans Bernet Board President —
Julie Buchanan Board Member —
Robert Rudd Board Member —
Marc Farmer Board Member —
Greg Fedders Secretary —
John Glynn Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 94 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.