Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 7.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 8.3% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 8.6% 58 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 11.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 8.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 7.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 10.6% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 11.7% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 9.7% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 8.8% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 10.2% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 6.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 10.4% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2010 — — 11.4% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE PEPICH EXECUTIVE DIR. 6.8% of Rev
JOHN CRIMMINGS Board President —
DEBRA KARP Board President —
JUSTIN PETERMAN Treasurer —
CLAIR HOLLAND Secretary —
ERIC MEIER Board Member —
TONY MAY Board Member —
LAURA MAASKE Board Member —
JANET POBAR Board Member —
MARK JANIUK Board Member —
VINCENT VENEGAS Board Member —
LORETTA OLSEN Board Member —
LAURA MILLION Board Member —
JAMES C SMALL Board Member —
DALE ZIERTEN Board Member —
CARL HIPP Board Member —
NANCY WHEELER Board Member —
NICHOLE ELCANO Board Member —
SUSAN BOLAND Board Member —
LISA MARIE BARBER Board Member —
LINEA ANTHONY Board Member —
JAMES WALKER Board Member —
NICOLE FARBO Board Member —
DENISE ROBERTS MCKEE Board Member —
JULIA OAS Board Member —
TOBY SIMPKINS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE PEPICH EXECUTIVE DIR. 6.2% of Rev
NANCY WHEELER Board Member —
NICHOLE ELCANO Board Member —
JAMES WALKER Board Member —
DENISE WILCOX Board Member —
JAMES C SMALL Board Member —
LORETTA OLSEN Board Member —
NIEL STAECK Board Member —
NICOLE FARBO Board Member —
SUSAN BOLAND Board Member —
DEBRA KARP Board Member —
DALE ZIERTEN Board Member —
CARL HIPP Board Member —
SHERONDA GLASS Board Member —
LAURA MILLION Board Member —
JANET POBAR Board Member —
JUSTIN PETERMAN Board Member —
LAURA MAASKE Board Member —
ERIC MEIER Board Member —
DIANE RUFFO Board President —
BEN FLEGEL Treasurer —
CLAIR HOLLAND Secretary —
JOHN CRIMMINGS Board President —
TONY MAY Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE PEPICH EXECUTIVE DIR. 6.0% of Rev
EVERETT MCKINNEY Board Member —
CAMELA LANGENDORF Board Member —
JAMES WALKER Board Member —
DENISE WILCOX Board Member —
JAMES C SMALL Board Member —
LORETTA OLSEN Board Member —
JOHN CRIMMINGS Board Member —
GERALD PTACEK Board Member —
SUSAN BOLAND Board Member —
GREG ANDEREGG Board Member —
KARA LAKATOS Board Member —
CARL HIPP Board Member —
SHERONDA GLASS Board Member —
DANIEL ROSS Board Member —
JANET POBAR Board Member —
JUSTIN PETERMAN Board Member —
LAURA MAASKE Board Member —
ERIC MEIER Board Member —
NEIL STAECK Board President —
CLAIR HOLLAND Secretary —
BEN FLEGEL Treasurer —
DIANE RUFFO Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 82 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 26 points below the peer median (55 vs. 81).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.