Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 7.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 12.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 12.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 15.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARRY GOODMAN Board President 3.0% of Rev
BRENT BUCKLEY Board Member
KIMBERLY DASHIELD-HILL Board Member
KEVIN DONAHUE Board Member
BRIAN DURDLE Board Member
MICHAEL FRANK Board President
EMILY HUGGINS JONES Board Member
SARAH KELLER Board Member
FAISAL KHAN Board Member
DENNIS LANSDOWNE Board Member
SARAH NORMAN Board Member
MADELEINE PARKER Board Member
JAMES PLUM Treasurer
RICHARD POGUE Board Member
MARQUES HILLMAN RICHESON Secretary
CICI RILEY Board Member
LISA MANCUSO SCHULTZ Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
GLADISA GUADALUPE Artistic Director 4.0% of Rev
BRENT BUCKLEY Board Member
KAREN CONLEY Board President
RYAN CROSS Board Member
KIMBERLY DASHIELD-HILL Board Member
KEVIN DONAHUE Board Member
MICHAEL FRANK Board President
LARRY GOODMAN Executive Director
ROE GREEN Board Member
SARAH KELLER Board Member
DENNIS LANSDOWNE Board Member
MADELEINE PARKER Board Member
JAMES PLUM Treasurer
RICHARD POGUE Board Member
MARQUES HILLMAN RICHESON Secretary
CICI RILEY Board Member
LISA MANCUSO SCHULTZ Board Member
SANDRA DRAKE SPARBER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GLADISA GUADALUPE Board Member 3.7% of Rev
MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY Board President 3.5% of Rev
KAREN M CONLEY VICE PRESIDE
RICHARD W POGUE Board President
MARQUES PD RICHESON Secretary
JAMES J PLUM Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GLADISA GUADALUPE Board Member 3.1% of Rev
DR MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY Executive Director 3.1% of Rev
KAREN M CONLEY Board President
RICHARD W POGUE Board President
MARQUES PD RICHESON Secretary
JAMES J PLUM Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 2.9% of Rev
GLADISA GUADALUPE Board Member 2.8% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (0 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.