Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 7.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 12.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 12.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 15.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 19 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARRY GOODMAN Board President 3.0% of Rev
BRENT BUCKLEY Board Member —
KIMBERLY DASHIELD-HILL Board Member —
KEVIN DONAHUE Board Member —
BRIAN DURDLE Board Member —
MICHAEL FRANK Board President —
EMILY HUGGINS JONES Board Member —
SARAH KELLER Board Member —
FAISAL KHAN Board Member —
DENNIS LANSDOWNE Board Member —
SARAH NORMAN Board Member —
MADELEINE PARKER Board Member —
JAMES PLUM Treasurer —
RICHARD POGUE Board Member —
MARQUES HILLMAN RICHESON Secretary —
CICI RILEY Board Member —
LISA MANCUSO SCHULTZ Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
GLADISA GUADALUPE Artistic Director 4.0% of Rev
BRENT BUCKLEY Board Member —
KAREN CONLEY Board President —
RYAN CROSS Board Member —
KIMBERLY DASHIELD-HILL Board Member —
KEVIN DONAHUE Board Member —
MICHAEL FRANK Board President —
LARRY GOODMAN Executive Director —
ROE GREEN Board Member —
SARAH KELLER Board Member —
DENNIS LANSDOWNE Board Member —
MADELEINE PARKER Board Member —
JAMES PLUM Treasurer —
RICHARD POGUE Board Member —
MARQUES HILLMAN RICHESON Secretary —
CICI RILEY Board Member —
LISA MANCUSO SCHULTZ Board Member —
SANDRA DRAKE SPARBER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GLADISA GUADALUPE Board Member 3.7% of Rev
MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY Board President 3.5% of Rev
KAREN M CONLEY VICE PRESIDE —
RICHARD W POGUE Board President —
MARQUES PD RICHESON Secretary —
JAMES J PLUM Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GLADISA GUADALUPE Board Member 3.1% of Rev
DR MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY Executive Director 3.1% of Rev
KAREN M CONLEY Board President —
RICHARD W POGUE Board President —
MARQUES PD RICHESON Secretary —
JAMES J PLUM Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR MICHAEL KRASNYANSKY CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD 2.9% of Rev
GLADISA GUADALUPE Board Member 2.8% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 329 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points below the peer median (0 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.