Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
21
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 57.4% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 4.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 4.0% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 10.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WREN T BROWN Secretary
PAUL HUDSON Board President
JACKIE DU-PONT WALKER Board Member
GARY WATSON Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WREN T BROWN Secretary
PAUL HUDSON Board President
GAIL PETERSON Board Member
AVIS FRANSIER-THOMAS Board Member
JACKIE DU-PONT WALKER Board Member
GARY WATSON Board Member
JIMAR WILSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Paul Hudson Board President
Wren T Brown Treasurer
Gail Peterson Board Member
Jackie Du-Pont Walker Board Member
Avis Frasier-Thomas Board Member
Gary Watson Board Member
Jimar Wilson Board Member
PAUL HUDSON Board President
WREN T BROWN Treasurer
GAIL PETERSON Board Member
JACKIE DU-PONT WALKER Board Member
AVIS FRASIER-THOMAS Board Member
GARY WATSON Board Member
JIMAR WILSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 57.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.