Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUE GREGORY Board Member —
MARIANNA FIEDOR Board Member —
SUSAN GRIGGS Board Member —
KENT ALLEN Board Member —
NICK LANGE Board Member —
OLIVIA PHILLIPS Board Member —
PAT BELLINGER Board Member —
KELLA CARTER Board Member —
TIM ROODVOETS Board Member —
CAROL FISCHHABER Board Member —
CATHY BENTON Board President —
CHERYL BRUFF Treasurer —
EMILY CASWELL Secretary —
RICK VANHAAFTEN Board President —
PAT BELLINGER Board Member —
CHERYL BRUFF Treasurer —
KELLA CARTER Board Member —
CAROL FISCHHABER Board Member —
CATHY BENTON Board President —
MARIANNA FIEDOR Board Member —
RICK VANHAAFTEN Board President —
EMILY CASWELL Secretary —
NICK LANGE Board Member —
KENT ALLEN Board Member —
SUSAN GRIGGS Board Member —
SUE GREGORY Board Member —
TIM ROODVOETS Board Member —
OLIVIA PHILLIPS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sue Gregory Board Member —
Marianna Fiedor Board Member —
Nick Lang Board Member —
Susan Griggs Board Member —
Sharon Skirke Board Member —
Cheryl Bruff Board Member —
Pat Bellinger Board Member —
Carol Fischhaber Board Member —
Kella Carter Board Member —
Chris Snow Treasurer —
Cathy Benton Board President —
Rick Vanhaaften Board President —
Emily Caswell Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pat Bellinger Board Member —
Cheryl Bruff Board Member —
Kella Carter Board Member —
Carol Fischhaber Board Member —
Cathy Benton Board President —
Marianna Fiedor Board Member —
Rick Vanhaaften Board President —
Emily Caswell Secretary —
Nick Lang Board Member —
Chris Snow Treasurer —
Dan Mitchell Board Member —
Susan Griggs Board Member —
Sue Gregory Board Member —
Sharon Skirke Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 177 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 66 points below the peer median (5 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.