Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 5.1% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 7.1% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 4.6% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 7.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 4.4% 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 4.2% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 5.1% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 6.2% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 5.9% 48 Fragile Recovery
2014 6.3% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 6.1% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 5.2% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 7.3% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTIN ARMSTRONG EXECUTIVE DI 5.2% of Rev
JEFF ANTAYA Board Member
JOHN ARMSTRONG Board President
MARY KAY BAKER Board Member
GINNY BROOKS Secretary
PATRICK COYLE Board Member
ROXANNE DECYK Board Member
JIM HUNDRIESER Board President
MATT JACKSON Board Member
CAROL JOSEFOWICZ Board Member
MIKE VAN METER Board Member
DEB MINTON Board Member
DAN RAK Board Member
PATSY RAMSEY Board Member
TRAVIS RANDOLPH Board Member
JIM SELLMAN Board Member
BRIAN STEPHENS Treasurer
LISA WYLIE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTIN ARMSTRONG EXECUTIVE DI 5.0% of Rev
JEFF ANTAYA Board Member
JOHN ARMSTRONG Board President
CATHERINE BLAGDURN Board Member
GINNY BROOKS Board Member
PATRICK COYLE Board Member
ROXANNE DECYK Secretary
STELIOS DOKIANAKIS Board Member
MICHAEL GANTT Treasurer
RICHARD HERIFORD Board President
JIM HUNDRIESER Board Member
MATT JACKSON Board Member
CAROL JOSEFOWICZ Board Member
MIKE VAN METER Board Member
DEB MINTON Board President
PATSY RAMSEY Board Member
TRAVIS RANDOLPH Board Member
JIM SELLMAN Board Member
BRIAN STEPHENS Board Member
LISA WYLIE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTIN ARMSTRONG EXECUTIVE DI 4.5% of Rev
JEFF ANTAYA Board Member
JOHN ARMSTRONG Board President
GINNY BROOKS Board Member
PATRICK COYLE Board Member
ROXANNE DECYK Secretary
STELIOS DOKIANAKIS Board Member
MICHAEL GANTT Treasurer
RICHARD HERIFORD Board President
MATT JACKSON Board Member
ANDY KNIGHT Board Member
MIKE VAN METER Board Member
DEB MINTON Board President
PATSY RAMSEY Board Member
TRAVIS RANDOLPH Board Member
JIM SELLMAN Board Member
BRIAN STEPHENS Board Member
LISA WYLIE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTIN ARMSTRONG EXECUTIVE DI 4.1% of Rev
JEFF ANTAYA Board Member
JOHN ARMSTRONG Secretary
GINNY BROOKS Board Member
PATRICK COYLE Board Member
ROXANNE DECYK Board Member
STELIOS DOKIANAKIS Secretary
MICHAEL GANTT Treasurer
RICHARD HERIFORD Board President
MATT JACKSON Board Member
SARAH DAVIS KESSLER Board Member
ANDY KNIGHT Board Member
MIKE VAN METER Board Member
DEB MINTON Board President
PATSY RAMSEY Board Member
TRAVIS RANDOLPH Board Member
JIM SELLMAN Board Member
BRIAN STEPHENS Board Member
LISA WYLIE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points below the peer median (15 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.