Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
34
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 28.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 34.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 36.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 32.5% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 25.7% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 24.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 24.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 26.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 22.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 29.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 30.3% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lisa Knight Executive Director 28.5% of Rev
Lisa Knight Executive Director 27.2% of Rev
Kevin Nelson Board President
Charles Max Frantz Treasurer
Cassie Fancher Board Member
Lynn Atkins-Rykert Board Member
Angie Hanks Board Member
Savator Selden Johnson Board Member
Debra Hines Board Member
Alexis Rocha Board Member
Jamie Masco Board Member
Majesty White Board Member
Dana Romero-Vogg Board Member
Jonathan Kornoelje Board Member
Courtney Flanagan Board President
Max Frantz Treasurer
Lynn Atkins-Rykert Board Member
Jonathan Kornoelje Board Member
Stephanie McNamara Board Member
Kim Mitchell Board Member
Staci Nichols Board Member
Kevin Nelson Board Member
Debra Hines Board Member
Cassadra Fancher Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lori Tennenhouse Executive Director 17.8% of Rev
Lisa Knight Executive Director 9.2% of Rev
Courtney Flanagan Board President
Connie Bellows Treasurer
Sara Bolster Board Member
Kim Mitchell Board Member
Stephanie McNamara Board Member
Jeneveine M Candler Board Member
Gabriel Calkins Board Member
Stacy Chalfoun Board Member
Jonathan Kornoelje Board Member
Evette Pittman Board Member
Lynn Atkins-Rykert Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lori Tennenhouse Executive Director 21.5% of Rev
Courtney Flanagan Board President
Connie Bellows Treasurer
Sara Bolster Board Member
Kim Mitchell Board Member
Stephanie McNamara Board Member
Jeneveine M Candler Board Member
Gabriel Calkins Board Member
Stacy Chalfoun Board Member
Jonathan Kornoelje Board Member
Barbara Osbourne Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lori Tennenhouse Executive Director 23.3% of Rev
Courtney Flanagan Board President
Connie Bellows Treasurer
Sara Bolster Board Member
Kim Mitchell Board Member
Stephanie McNamara Board Member
Jeneveine M Candler Board Member
Dormica Oppenhulzen Board Member
Stacy Chalfoun Board Member
Venky Venkatesh Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points below the peer median (25 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.