Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 11.7% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 — — 5.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 Hidden Hidden 8.6% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 8.7% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 8.1% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 8.2% 46 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL NAESS Board President 7.8% of Rev
KAY WALVOORD THRU 43025 Board President 3.9% of Rev
RUTH CROUCH Board President —
KAY HUBBARD Board President —
JAN DALMAN Secretary —
TIM DYK Treasurer —
SARAH BAST Board Member —
SARAH BRIGGS Board Member —
KETZI CHACON-ZYLSTRA Board Member —
RACHEL COUSSENS Board Member —
DON COWIE Board Member —
SUSAN FORMSMA Board Member —
TODD KLIPP Board Member —
TARA LEONARD Board Member —
TRINA LICHTENWALNER Board Member —
SHANDRA MARTINEZ Board Member —
SUSAN MILLER Board Member —
LUKE PANNING Board Member —
MARILYN SCHMIDT Board Member —
PAUL TEN ELSHOF Board Member —
MIKE USHER Board Member —
JANE VANDERMEER Board Member —
MARCIA WESTRATE Board Member —
JOANNA NORRIS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAY WALVOORD Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
JEAN OLNEY Board Member —
ANN QUERY CHAIRMAN —
JAN DALMAN Secretary —
MARILYN SCHMIDT Board Member —
RUTH CROUCH Board Member —
TIM DYK Treasurer —
SUSAN FORMSMA Board Member —
SARAH BAST Board Member —
PAUL TEN ELSHOF Board Member —
JANE VANDER MEER Board Member —
MIKE USHER Board Member —
DON COWIE Board Member —
SHANDRA MARTINEZ Board Member —
TARA LEONARD Board Member —
MARCIA WESTRATE Board Member —
JOSH ZALLAR Board Member —
SARAH BRIGGS Board Member —
RACHEL COUSSENS Board Member —
TRINA LICHTENWALNER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAY WALVOORD Board President 5.4% of Rev
RAYETTA PEREZ Board Member —
PAUL TEN ELSHOF Board Member —
JANE VANDER MEER Board Member —
JEAN OLNEY CHAIRMAN —
ANN QUERY VICE CHAIRMA —
MATTHEW WIEBE Treasurer —
JAN DALMAN Secretary —
JANE ARMSTRONG Board Member —
CATHY BEKKEN Board Member —
MARILYN SCHMIDT Board Member —
RUTH CROUCH Board Member —
TIM DYK Board Member —
SUSAN FORMSMA Board Member —
SHERRIE SANTOS Board Member —
RON GEROW Board Member —
JUANITA BOCANEGRA Board Member —
LINDA STROUF Board Member —
GREG BASSETT Board Member —
MARCIA FORSMAN Board Member —
BARB MCNALLY Board Member —
SARAH BAST Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.