Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.0% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 4.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 11.5% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 4.6% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 2.7% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 4.5% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 2.1% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 4.9% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 4.5% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 2.7% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 2.8% 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 7.4% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATIE HUBBARD Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
PETER BROWN Board Member
CHARLES CRAVES CO-VICE-CHAI
PHILIP J CURTIS Board Member
AARON DWORKIN Board Member
CHARLES EISENDRATH Secretary
PETER FEENEY Board Member
MARTHA FUERSTENAU Board Member
SHEILA FORD HAMP Board Member
STEVEN K HAMP Board Member
DAVID LARSEN CHAIRMAN
MARIA LEONHAUSER CO-VICE-CHAI
DAVID LIGOTTI Treasurer
DR YING LI MD Board Member
JOHN JH SCHWARZ MD Board Member
GEORGE MOSES Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATIE HUBBARD Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
PETER BROWN Board Member
CHARLES CRAVES CO-VICE-CHAI
PHILIP J CURTIS Board Member
AARON DWORKIN Board Member
CHARLES EISENDRATH Secretary
PETER FEENEY Board Member
MARTHA FUERSTENAU Board Member
SHEILA FORD HAMP Board Member
STEVEN K HAMP Board Member
DAVID LARSEN CHAIRMAN
MARIA LEONHAUSER CO-VICE-CHAI
DAVID LIGOTTI Treasurer
DR YING LI MD Board Member
JOHN JH SCHWARZ MD Board Member
GEORGE MOSES Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATIE HUBBARD Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
PETER BROWN Board Member
CHARLES CRAVES CO-VICE-CHAI
PHILIP J CURTIS Board Member
AARON DWORKIN Board Member
CHARLES EISENDRATH Secretary
PETER FEENEY Board Member
MARTHA FUERSTENAU Board Member
SHEILA FORD HAMP Board Member
STEVEN K HAMP Board Member
DAVID LARSEN CHAIRMAN
MARIA LEONHAUSER CO-VICE-CHAI
DAVID LIGOTTI Treasurer
JOHN JH SCHWARZ MD Board Member
GEORGE MOSES Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATIE HUBBARD Executive Director 3.6% of Rev
PETER BROWN Board Member
CHARLES CRAVES Board Member
PHILIP J CURTIS Board Member
JEFF DANIELS FOUNDER
CHARLES EISENDRATH Board Member
PETER FEENEY VICE CHAIRMA
STEVEN K HAMP CO-CHAIRPERS
DAVID LARSEN Board Member
MARIA LEONHAUSER Secretary
DAVID LIGOTTI Treasurer
JOHN JH SCHWARZ MD Board Member
JOHN MANN Board Member
GEORGE MOSES Board Member
SHEILA FORD HAMP CO-CHAIRPERS

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PETER BROWN Board Member
CRAIG COMMON Secretary
CHARLES CRAVES Board Member
PHILIP J CURTIS Board Member
JEFF DANIELS FOUNDER
CHARLES EISENDRATH Board Member
PETER FEENEY VICE CHAIRMA
H RON GRIFFITH Board Member
SHEILA FORD HAMP CO-CHAIRMAN
STEVEN K HAMP CO-CHAIRMAN
DAVID LARSEN Board Member
MARIA LEONHAUSER Board Member
DAVID LIGOTTI Treasurer
JOHN JH SCHWARZ MD Board Member
JOHN MANN Board Member
GEORGE MOSES Board Member
KATIE HUBBARD Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.