Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 56.7% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 36.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 24.2% 36 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 37.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 39.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 37.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 32.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 39.4% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 15.9% 35 Fragile Recovery
2013 23.6% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 26.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 24.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bonnie Loukus Board Member 28.6% of Rev
Cynthia Cote Executive Director 19.7% of Rev
Mat Moore Board Member
Ellen R Campbell Treasurer
Stephanie Carpenter Board President
Ian Raymond Board Member
Beth Cook Board Member
Susanna Peters Board President
Linda Lohmann Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cynthia Cote Executive Director 30.8% of Rev
Meg Pachmayer Board Member
Susanna Peters Board Member
John Arnold Board Member
Lana Skubick Board Member
Lynn Lohmann Board Member
Stephanie Carpenter Board President
Kris Raisanen Schourek Secretary
Ellen Campbell Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (10 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 56.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.