Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
43
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Governance Advisory

📋 Compliance Status

State Annual Report
Status: OVERDUE
Overdue: 192 days

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 9.6% 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 7.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 10.0% 35 Fragile Recovery
2020 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 12.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2018 14.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 11.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 15.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 18.6% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 14.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 14.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 17.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 16.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Flax Board Member
Craig Hansen Board Member
Michael Zeilik Board Member
Dana Chodzko Board Member
Cris Moore Board Member
Loie Fecteau Board Member
Danielle Reddick Board Member
Mariah Olesen Board Member
Alex Herrera Board Member
Ulrike Campbell Board Member
Jonathan Ashworth Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ulrike Campbell Board Member
Jonathan Ashworth Board Member
John Flax Board Member
Craig Hansen Board Member
Michael Zeilik Board Member
Dana Chodzko Board Member
Cris Moore Board Member
Loie Fecteau Board Member
Danielle Reddick Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ulrike Campbell Board Member
Casey Janes Board Member
John Flax Board Member
Craig Hansen Board Member
Michael Zeilik Board Member
Dana Chodzko Board Member
Cris Moore Board Member
Loie Fecteau Board Member
Danielle Reddick Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 51 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 8 points above the peer median (55 vs. 47).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

Overall score has gone from 39 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.