Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.0% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 11.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.8% 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 10.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 9.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 8.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 38 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEDRIK MERWIN Executive Director 6.0% of Rev
SEBASTIAN GARBSCH Board President —
PAUL JARBOE Board President —
LINDSEY JONKHOFF ROGERS Secretary —
TANYA LAPRADE Treasurer —
SUSAN COGSWELL Board President —
KADRA KIERCZYNSKI Board Member —
WARD LAMPHERE Board Member —
SUZANNE ALBRECHT Board Member —
DON BELL Board Member —
DOROTHY CLORE Board Member —
SHERRI DECAMP Board Member —
DR ROB JONES Board Member —
MARY BETH MILIKEN Board Member —
MARSHA MINERVINI Board Member —
KENT MUELLER Board Member —
BOB STREIT Board Member —
SUZANNE VOLTZ Board Member —
DICK WALLACE Board Member —
M WOODY WRIGHT Board Member —
DAVID C JOHNSON Board Member —
ALEXIS NINK Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEDRIK MERWIN Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
ROBERT HETLER Board Member —
DON BELL Board Member —
MARY BETH MILIKEN Board Member —
DICK WALLACE Board Member —
SUZY VOLTZ Board Member —
ROBERT GILES Board President —
WARD LAMPHERE Board President —
TOM SKINNER Secretary —
SUSAN COGSWELL Board President —
KADRA KIERCZYNSKI Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEDRIK MERWIN Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
ROBERT GILES Board Member —
ROBERT HETLER Board Member —
MARY BETH MILIKEN Board Member —
PAUL JARBOE Board Member —
DICK WALLACE Board Member —
SUZY VOLTZ Board Member —
WARD LAMPHERE Board President —
DON BELL Board President —
TOM SKINNER Secretary —
SUSAN COGSWELL Board President —
KADRA KIERCZYNSKI Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KEDRIK MERWIN Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
ROBERT HETLER Board Member —
E THOMAS MAGUIRE Board Member —
DON BELL Board Member —
TOM SKINNER Board Member —
AMY RADFORD Board Member —
RON YOCUM Board Member —
MARY BETH MILIKEN Board Member —
ROBERT GILES Board President —
WARD LAMPHERE Board President —
SUSAN COGSWELL Board President —
KADRA KIERCZYNSKI Treasurer —
GEOFFREY PECKHAM Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.