Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 8.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 13.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 9.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLES WINFREY EXECUTIVE DI 6.9% of Rev
LINDA BOOTH VOTING MEMBE
NANCY EDWARDS VOTING MEMBE
DAPHNE EPPS VOTING MEMBE
ARTHUR EVANS VOTING MEMBE
HEATHER KALE VOTING MEMBE
CAREN FORDHAM KNIGHT VOTING MEMBE
MELINDA ANDERSON Secretary
EUGENE BOWMEN Treasurer
SHIRLEY F HENDERSON Board President
JAMES O SHELLY PHD VICE CHAIRPE

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLES WINFREY Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
DEAVEN WALKER Board Member
DONNA ULRICH Board Member
ARTHUR EVANS DIRECOTR
VERONA TERRY Board Member
DR JAMES SHELLEY VICE CHAIRMAN
HERBERT WINFREY Board Member
DAPHNE EPPS Board Member
EUGENE BROWN Treasurer
SHIRLEY HENDERSON Board Member
CAREN FORDHAM KNIGHT Board Member
LINDA BOOTH Board Member
MELINDA ANDERSON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELAINE GREEN Board Member
SOMMER GREEN Board Member
LINDA GULLEY Board Member
REGINA MARSHALL Board Member
FLOSSIE WIGGINS Board Member
VERONA TERRY Board Member
DR JAMES SHELLEY Board Member
FANNIE NORRIS SECRETARYTREASURER
LOUIS HAWKINS VICE CHAIRMAN
SHIRLEY HENDERSON Board President
CAREN KNIGHT Board Member
LINDA BOOTH Board Member
MELINDA ANDERSON Board Member
CHARLES WINFREY Executive Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLES WINFREY Executive Director 7.3% of Rev
REGINA MARSHALL Board Member
ELAINE GREEN Board Member
SOMMER GREEN Board Member
FLOSSIE WIGGINS Board Member
VERONA TERRY Board Member
DR JAMES SHELLEY Board Member
LINDA GULLEY Board Member
FANNIE NORRIS SECRETARYTREASURER
LOUIS HAWKINS VICE CHAIRMAN
SHIRLEY HENDERSON Board President
CAREN KNIGHT Board Member
LINDA BOOTH Board Member
MELINDA ANDERSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 186 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (5 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.