Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
36
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.1% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 59.4% 41 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 8.0% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 7.9% 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 41 Fragile Recovery
2013 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER RISTOSKI Artistic Director 14.8% of Rev
PAM KACZMAREK Board President 4.2% of Rev
NICOLE THORNE Board President 1.1% of Rev
ALEXSANDRA STANISZEWSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER RISTOSKI Artistic Director 10.7% of Rev
PAM KACZMAREK Board President 3.2% of Rev
NICOLE THORNE Board President
ALEXSANDRA STANISZEWSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER RISTOSKI Artistic Director 8.5% of Rev
PAM KACZMAREK Board President 3.2% of Rev
NICOLE THORNE Board President 2.1% of Rev
ALEXSANDRA STANISZEWSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER RISTOSKI Artistic Director 7.4% of Rev
PAM KACZMAREK Board President 3.2% of Rev
NICOLE THORNE Board President
ALEXSANDRA STANISZEWSKI Treasurer
LOUISA ARTELT Board Member
MONICA KEREKES Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points above the peer median (65 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.