Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 10.7% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 16.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 13.0% 35 Fragile Recovery
2019 10.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 11.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH WATSON EXECUTIVE DI 13.3% of Rev
PATRICIA FISCHER Board Member
GRACE GARNO Board Member
MARK HAAG Board Member
RICHARD HEDRICK Board Member
ASHLEY HUTCHINSON Board Member
BRONNA KAHLE Board Member
CHRIS MILLER Board Member
BARB MITZEL Board Member
CHIP MOORE Board Member
MICHAEL OLSAVER Board Member
CATHERINE SALA Board Member
MARK SCHERSTEN Board President
STEVEN SHERMAN Board Member
SARAH STANLEY Board Member
JOSH TEJKL Board Member
MICHELE BUKU Secretary
DREW GIETZEN Treasurer
PATT HAYES Board President
MILLIE PRUETT Treasurer
JOANN SANBORN Board President
JOAN BOWMAN Board Member
GERRY BURG Board Member
JIM COLMAN Board Member
MADELINE DEMARCO Board Member
TRAVIS ERXLEBEN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH WATSON EXECUTIVE DI 13.0% of Rev
JOAN BOWMAN Board Member
MICHELE BUKU Secretary
GERRY BURG Board Member
JIM COLMAN Board Member
PATRICIA FISCHER Board Member
GRACE GARNO Board Member
PATT HAYES Board President
RICHARD HEDRICK Board Member
ASHLEY HUTCHINSON Board Member
BRONNA KAHLE Board Member
KATIE MATTISON Board Member
CHRIS MILLER Board Member
BARB MITZEL Board Member
CHIP MOORE Board Member
MICHAEL OLSAVER Board Member
MILLIE PRUETT Treasurer
CATHERINE SALA Board Member
JOANN SANBORN Board Member
MARK SCHERSTEN Board President
STEVEN SHERMAN Board Member
AMANDA DAVIS SCOTT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH WATSON EXECUTIVE DI 10.4% of Rev
LARRY BOGUSZ Board Member
MICHELE BUKU Secretary
GERRY BURG Board Member
JIM COLEMAN Board Member
PATRICIA FISCHER Board Member
GRACE GARNO Board Member
PATT HAYES Board President
ASHLEY HUTCHINSON Board Member
BRONNA KAHLE Board Member
KATIE MATTISON Board Member
CHRIS MILLER Board Member
BARB MITZEL Board Member
CHIP MOORE Board Member
MICHAEL OLSAVER Board Member
MILLIE PRUETT Treasurer
CATHERINE SALA Board Member
JOANN SANBORN Board Member
MARK SCHERSTEN Board President
AMANDA DAVIS SCOTT Board Member
TREVOR VAN VALKENBURG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 186 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.