Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
40
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 11.5% 40 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 9.8% 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 17.0% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 9.5% 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 11.0% 38 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 12.4% 38 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 13.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — 12.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — 11.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 4.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 38.0% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 13.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 13.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA CROTTY Secretary —
RON ELDER Treasurer —
DIANE HEATH Board Member —
BRIAN KATZ Board Member —
LINDA DAVIS KIRKSEY Board Member —
RACHELLE PROPSON LENNON Board Member —
JOANN MARINO VICE PRESIDE —
HEATHER PIZZALA Board Member —
MICHA RAWLINGS Board Member —
TECKLA RHOADS Board President —
DEB SILVERS Board Member —
DR BRENDA WALKER Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHAUN HAYES Executive Director —
TECKLA RHOADS Board President —
JOANN MARINO Board President —
RON ELDER Treasurer —
DIANE HEATH Secretary —
DR BRENDA WALKER Board Member —
LINDA DAVIS KIRKSEY Board Member —
SHELLY PROPSON TYSHKA Board Member —
HEATHER PIZZALA Board Member —
MICHA RAWLINGS Board Member —
MELISSA CROTTY Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TECKLA RHOADS Board President —
JOANN MARINO Board President —
RON ELDER Treasurer —
DIANE HEATH Secretary —
DR BRENDA WALKER Board Member —
LINDA DAVIS KIRKSEY Board Member —
SHELLY PROPSON TYSHKA Board Member —
ROBERT BLOOMINGDALE Board Member —
HEATHER PIZZALA Board Member —
MICHA RAWLINGS Board Member —
SHAUN HAYES Executive Director —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH CHILTON Executive Director 8.9% of Rev
JOANN MARINO Board President —
DEBBIE COREY Board Member —
CHRIS TANANA Board President —
RON ELDER Treasurer —
TECKLA RHOADS Secretary —
MELANIE PARKER Board Member —
Board Member —
LINDA DAVIS KIRKSEY Board Member —
SHELLY PROPSON TYSHKA Board Member —
ROBERT BLOOMINGDALE Board Member —
LINDA ZABIK Board Member —
BEV LOWES Board Member —
HEATHER PIZZALA Board Member —
DEDE KIMBLE Board Member —
JOANN MARINO Board President —
DEBBIE COREY Board Member —
CHRIS TANANA Board President —
RON ELDER Treasurer —
TECKLA RHOADS Secretary —
MELANIE PARKER Board Member —
DR BRENDA WALKER Board Member —
LINDA DAVIS KIRKSEY Board Member —
SHELLY PROPSON TYSHKA Board Member —
ROBERT BLOOMINGDALE Board Member —
LINDA ZABIK Board Member —
BEV LOWES Board Member —
HEATHER PIZZALA Board Member —
DEDE KIMBLE Board Member —
ELIZABETH CHILTON Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 177 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points below the peer median (20 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.