Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 8.2% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 6.7% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 13.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 17.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 14.1% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — 13.3% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEWAUN ROBINSON Board Member —
JAMES DRAPER Board Member —
LOUIS HAWKINS Board Member —
GARY JONES Board Member —
KIMBERLY COLE Board Member —
LAURA MCGUIRE Board Member —
DIANE RUDDY-WOLBERT Board Member —
GREG FIEDLER Executive Director —
CHARLES BOIKE Secretary —
THOMAS WEBBER Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GREG FIEDLER Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
GARY JONES Board Member —
CAROLE HICKEY Board Member —
KIMBERLY COLE Board Member —
DIANE RUDDY Board Member —
LAURA MCGUIRE Board Member —
DEWAUN ROBINSON Board Member —
CHARLES C COLLISON Jr Board Member —
LOUIS HAWKINS Board Member —
JAMES DRAPER Board Member —
CHARLES BOIKE Secretary —
THOMAS WEBBER Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GREG FIEDLER Executive Director 3.5% of Rev
JAMES DRAPER Board Member —
GARY JONES Board Member —
CAROLE HICKEY Board Member —
LOUIS HAWKINS Board Member —
DEWAUN ROBINSON Board Member —
DAVID BROADWORTH Board Member —
CHARLES C COLLISON Jr Board Member —
THOMAS WEBBER Board President —
CHARLES BOIKE Secretary —
MARK CORRIGAN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLE HICKEY Board Member —
CHARLES C COLLISON Jr Board Member —
LOUIS HAWKINS Board Member —
JAMES DRAPER Board Member —
GARY JONES Board Member —
DEWAUN ROBINSON Board Member —
DAVID BROADWORTH Board Member —
THOMAS WEBBER Board President —
GREG FIEDLER Executive Director —
CHARLES BOIKE Secretary —
MARK CORRIGAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 281 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.