Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 14.3% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 2.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 6.8% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 4.5% 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 6.4% 58 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 5.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 12.1% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 10.9% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 12.2% 48 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 15.3% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW AUBIN EXEC/MUSIC D 6.5% of Rev
SAMUEL BARNES Board President —
DEL BELCHER Board Member —
BEN BUTTERFIELD Board Member —
DANIEL CASILLO Board Member —
GAELL CASSIN-ROSS Board Member —
SHAWN CHRISTIE Board Member —
LAURIE CUNNINGHAM Treasurer —
ROBERT DAVY Board Member —
RUSS DESY Board Member —
STEPHEN FOSTER Board Member —
QUENTIN GUINN Board Member —
SHAUN HUANG Secretary —
JI HUYN KIM Board Member —
JON LAKE Board Member —
JACKIE LIVESAY Board Member —
ANGELA MACHNIK Board Member —
VICKI MCFERRAN Board Member —
PHILIP MOILANEN Board Member —
JAMES PARK Board Member —
ANTONIO PARKER Board Member —
GREG RUPPRECHT Board Member —
ANNIE STEWARD Board Member —
LAURA TROMBLEY Board Member —
JESSICA WEBB Board Member —
DOUG WILCOXSON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW AUBIN Board Member 6.1% of Rev
VICTORIA MCFERRAN Board Member —
PHIL MOILANEN Board Member —
JENNIFER MORRIS Board Member —
QUINTEN GUINN Board Member —
LARRY HALMAN Board Member —
ANGELA MACHNIK Board Member —
STEFANIE RIGGS Board Member —
LAURA TROMBLEY Board Member —
CARLENE WALZ-LEFERE Board Member —
JESSICA WEBB Board Member —
ANNIE STEWARD Board Member —
JOHN WALDRON Board Member —
SHAWN CHRISTIE Board Member —
STEPHEN FOSTER Board Member —
SAM BARNES Board President —
DEL BELCHER Board Member —
LAURA DWYER SCHLECTE Board Member —
EARL POLESKI Board Member —
ERIN MAZUR Board Member —
THOMAS SPRING Board Member —
DAVID CRAFT Board Member —
RUSS DESY Board Member —
KAREN BUNNELL Board Member —
ANITA FOBES Board Member —
ROBERT DAVEY Board Member —
LAURIE CUNNINGHAM Treasurer —
SHAUN HUANG Secretary —
DOUGLAS WILCOXSON Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points below the peer median (15 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 59 → 38 over 5 years (declining by 21 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.