Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.1% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 8.8% 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 14.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 11.2% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 10.2% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 10.7% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 10.4% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 12.8% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 11.8% 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — 12.8% 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — 13.1% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 — — 15.2% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 6.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGHAN MARTIN Executive Director 9.1% of Rev
AMI ICEMAN-HAUETER Board President —
TAYLOR GAST Board President —
JANET LILLIE Secretary —
KATHIE FELDPAUSCH Treasurer —
RACHEL ELSINGA Board Member —
JILL FELDPAUSCH Board Member —
SUBAN NUR COOLEY Board Member —
JULIE PINGSTON Board Member —
ANDIE POOLE Board Member —
BREINA PUGH Board Member —
LOLO ROBISON Board Member —
MARK WARNER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA M MARTIN Executive Director 7.2% of Rev
LOLO ROBISON Board President —
RACHEL ELSINGA Board President —
AMI ICEMAN-HAUETER Secretary —
KATHIE FELDPAUSCH Treasurer —
TAYLOR GAST Board Member —
JANET LILLIE Board Member —
CHRIS HARKINS Board Member —
KIRK MEADOWS Board Member —
JULIE PINGSTON Board Member —
STEPHEN SERKAIAN Board Member —
ASHLEE WILLIS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA M MARTIN Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
KRISTIN BELTZER Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER HARKINS Board Member —
ANN ICEMAN-HAUETER Board Member —
JANET LILLIE Board Member —
TAYLOR GAST Board Member —
GEORGE ORBAN Board Member —
JULIE PINGSTON Board Member —
NATHAN TRIPLETT Board Member —
ASHLEE WILLIS Board Member —
KIRK MEADOWS Board Member —
STEPHEN SERKAIAN Board President —
RACHEL ELSINGA Board President —
KATHIE FELDPAUSCH Treasurer —
LOLO ROBISON Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREA M MARTIN Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
AMI ICEMAN-HAUETER Board Member —
KRISTIN BELTZER Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER HARKINS Board Member —
JANET LILLIE Board Member —
LOLO ROBINSON Board Member —
JULIE PINGSTON Board Member —
STELLA CASH Board Member —
GEORGE ORBAN Board Member —
NATHAN TRIPLETT Board Member —
TAYLOR GAST Board Member —
ASHLEE WILLIS Board Member —
KIRK MEADOWS Board Member —
PATTY LLOYD BARNAS Board President —
KATHIE FELDPAUSCH Treasurer —
RACHEL ELSINGA Secretary —
STEPHEN SERKAIAN Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 177 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (40 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.