Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.8% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 6.8% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 10.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 10.9% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 8.0% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 10.4% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 8.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 10.1% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 9.8% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 12.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.2% 52 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 12.5% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES SOFRANKO Artistic Director 3.5% of Rev
MARY JENNINGS EXECUTIVE DI 2.1% of Rev
GLENN DEL VECCHIO EXECUTIVE DI 2.1% of Rev
JAMIE SLOTSEMA Board President —
ASHLEIGH E DRAFT VICE PRESIDE —
LEAH VOIGT Treasurer —
LESLIE ABDOO Secretary —
AMANDA AVILA Board Member —
KIMBERLY BURKE Board Member —
HELLE LINNEBJERG HAW Board Member —
MICHAEL LOJEK Board Member —
KELLY MAY Board Member —
ANDREA NEMES Board Member —
DALE SCHRIEMER Board Member —
BRANDON TOMASH Board Member —
MARY A YURKO Board Member —
CAROL MUTH Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GLENN DEL VECCHIO EXECUTIVE DI 3.9% of Rev
JAMES SOFRANKO Artistic Director 3.0% of Rev
LEAH VOIGT Board President —
JEFF GURNEY VICE PRESIDE —
ADMIR LUGONJIC Treasurer —
MEREDITH ERVINE Secretary —
JOHN NIENHUIS Board President —
LESLIE DICKINSON Board Member —
ASHLEIGH E DRAFT Board Member —
HELLE LINNEBJERG HAW Board Member —
IAN M HUNTER Board Member —
BETH JABIN Board Member —
MICHAEL LOJEK Board Member —
DALE SCHRIEMER Board Member —
JAMIE SLOTSEMA Board Member —
JOHN VAN FOSSEN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GLENN DEL VECCHIO EXECUTIVE DI 4.1% of Rev
JAMES SOFRANKO Artistic Director 3.1% of Rev
LEAH VOIGT Board President —
JEFF GURNEY VICE PRESIDE —
ADMIR LUGONJIC Treasurer —
MEREDITH ERVINE Secretary —
JOHN NIENHUIS DEVELOPMENT —
LESLIE DICKINSON Board Member —
IAN M HUNTER Board Member —
MICHAEL LOJEK Board Member —
TAMARA REEVES Board Member —
DALE SCHRIEMER Board Member —
JOHN VAN FOSSEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GLENN DEL VECCHIO EXECUTIVE DI 4.1% of Rev
JAMES SOFRANKO Artistic Director 3.2% of Rev
LEAH VOIGT Board President —
JOHN NIENHUIS VICE PRESIDE —
MICHAEL P KLING Treasurer —
JEFF GURNEY Secretary —
IAN M HUNTER DEVELOPMENT —
AMY NORKUS Treasurer —
LESLIE DICKINSON Board Member —
MEREDITH ERVINE Board Member —
MICHAEL LOJEK Board Member —
ADMIR LUGONJIC Board Member —
TAMARA REEVES Board Member —
DALE SCHRIEMER Board Member —
JOHN VAN FOSSEN Board Member —
ANDA VIZULIS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.