Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 7.7% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 8.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 8.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.2% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 — — 9.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 10.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — 10.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 8.7% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 8.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — 10.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 12.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAMELA AYRES Board President 8.1% of Rev
PAMELA AYRES Board President 7.7% of Rev
KAROLINA POWALKA Board President —
KAREN EBBEN Board President —
BROOKE KIRCHER Board President —
RICK MARQUETTE Secretary —
TODD PADO Treasurer —
RYAN HUSAYNU Board President —
CHRISTOPHER BAHRKE Board Member —
KATE BURTON Board Member —
FIDELER STEVEN Board Member —
SACHINDER HANS Board Member —
NODING JODI Board Member —
SCHEUBER WILLIAM Board Member —
KAROLINA POWALKA Board President —
KAREN EBBEN Board President —
BROOKE KIRCHER Board President —
RICK MARQUETTE Secretary —
HAROLD MELOCHE Treasurer —
RYAN HUSAYNU Board President —
CHRISTOPHER BAHRKE Board Member —
KATE BURTON Board Member —
HEATHER DELL Board Member —
BRI DUFF Board Member —
JEFF LUSKO Board Member —
SAMANTHA MCLEOD Board Member —
JODI NODING Board Member —
MARION SMITH Board Member —
MARIA THOMAS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAMELA AYRES Board President 7.0% of Rev
KAROLINA POWALKA Board President —
BROOKE KIRCHER Board President —
KAREN EBBEN Board President —
RICK MARQUETTE Secretary —
HAROLD MELOCHE Treasurer —
RYAN HUSAYNU Board President —
CHRISTOPHER BAHRKE Board Member —
KATE BURTON Board Member —
ELIZABETH CASSELMAN Board Member —
HEATHER DELL Board Member —
BRI DUFF Board Member —
PETER HANIAK Board Member —
SAMANTHA MCLEOD Board Member —
JODI NODING Board Member —
MARK PALMER Board Member —
MARION SMITH Board Member —
MARIA THOMAS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAMELA AYRES Board President 5.5% of Rev
KAROLINA POWALKA Board President —
KAREN EBBEN Board President —
BROOKE KIRCHER Board President —
RICK MARQUETTE Secretary —
HAROLD MELOCHE Treasurer —
RYAN HUSAYNU Board President —
CHRISTOPHER BAHRKE Board Member —
ROBERT BLUMENFELD Board Member —
KATE BURTON Board Member —
HEATHER DELL Board Member —
SOURIPHORN GAILLARD Board Member —
MARK PALMER Board Member —
WENDEE REX Board Member —
MARIA THOMAS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 281 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.