Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
34
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 22.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 18.4% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHY BOWER Secretary
MATT DUTHLER Board Member
KEVIN ENGLUND Board Member
STEPHANIE GANDULLA Board Member
LINDSAY HIGGINS Board Member
RICK HOUCHIN Board Member
STEVE JAKUBCIN VICE PRESIDE
PHINDI MASHININI Board Member
LINDA MCMILLAN Board President
MARIFLOR RAMIREZ Board Member
SHANNON ROESKE Board Member
STACEY STEWART Board Member
DAWN STONE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHY BOWER Secretary
MELISSA BURNS VICE PRESIDE
NICHOLA CORNELIUS Board Member
STAPHANIE GANDULLA Board Member
ANNE GENTRY Board Member
RICK HOUCHIN Board Member
STEVE JAKUBCIN Board Member
KRISTEN KOWALSKI Board President
PHINDI MASHININI Board Member
LINDA MCMILLAN Treasurer
MOLLY STEPANSKI Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 10 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (30 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 9 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.