Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 3.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 5.8% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 6.0% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 3.9% 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 5.6% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 6.2% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 5.4% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 5.3% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 4.1% 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — 4.6% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 10.5% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 4.7% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 1.6% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GUS GORDON Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
ERIC FLICK Board President —
DR NICOLE FLORENCE Board President —
CYNDY RICE Secretary —
TOM RYDER Treasurer —
ASHLEY COKER Board President —
BRIAN MITCHELL Board President —
ANGIE ACAKAPO-SATCHIVI Board Member —
CAROLYN FLEISCHLI Board Member —
CRAIG MCFARLAND Board Member —
JANE BROWNBACK Board Member —
JESSICA NARDULLI Board Member —
KIP LEVERTON Board Member —
LESLIE SGRO Board Member —
LYNN GILMORE Board Member —
MARK MCDONALD Board Member —
PARIS ERVIN DOYL Board Member —
PATRICK FOSTER Board Member —
PENNY MCCARTY Board Member —
SHEILA WALK Board Member —
T DAVID PARKER Board Member —
TIFFANI SAUNDERS Board Member —
TIM CRAWFORD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GUS GORDON Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
LEIGH STEINER Board President —
ASHLEY COKER Board President —
GINA SOLOMON Secretary —
CHERYL WISE Treasurer —
ALYSSA HAACKER Board Member —
ELIZABETH KRAH Board Member —
HO BROWNBACK Board Member —
JULIE CELLLINI Board Member —
JESSICA NARDULLI Board Member —
LESLIE SGRO Board Member —
PENNY MCCARTY Board Member —
ERIC FLICK Board Member —
PARIS ERVIN DOYLE Board Member —
PATRICK FOSTER Board Member —
BRIAN MITCHELL Board Member —
TIFFANY MATHIS Board Member —
MARK MCDONALD Board Member —
TIM CRAWFORD Board Member —
SANDY BELLATTI Board Member —
KIP LEVERTON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GUS GORDON Executive Director 2.8% of Rev
SANDY BELLATTI Board President —
LEIGH STEINER Board President —
ASHLEY COKER Board President —
GINA SOLOMON Secretary —
CHERYL WISE Treasurer —
ALYSSA HAACKER Board Member —
CLARICE FORD THRU 420 Board Member —
ELIZABETH KRAH Board Member —
HO BROWNBACK Board Member —
JULIE CELLLINI Board Member —
JULIE NARDULLI Board Member —
LESLIE SGRO Board Member —
PENNY MCCARTY Board Member —
WHITNEY BARNES Board Member —
JUSTIN CARTER Board Member —
BOB GRAY Board Member —
KIP LEVERTON Board Member —
TONY LIBRI Board Member —
BRIAN MITCHELL Board Member —
TIFFANY MATTHIS Board Member —
MARK MCDONALD Board Member —
TIM CRAWFORD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.