Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
22
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 23.9% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 25.1% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 17.3% 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIKE SISSON Board Member
VICKY BERRY Board Member
RICHARD JANISSE Treasurer
NANCY KUHN Secretary
ARIN LEVER Board Member
MICHAEL HANNLEY Board President
JULIE BOTTUMS Board Member
NANCY KUHN Secretary
ARIN LEVER Board Member
MICHAEL HANNLEY Board President
MIKE SISSON Board Member
VICKY BERRY Board Member
RICHARD JANISSE Treasurer
JULIE BOTTUM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE BOTTUM Executive Dir. 23.9% of Rev
SYLVIA MEDINA Board President
NANCY KUHN Secretary
MARANDA JOHNSON Board Member
ARIN LEVER Board Member
MICHAEL HANLEY Board Member
MIKE SISSON Board Member
VICKY BERRY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA HODGE Executive Director 9.9% of Rev
JULIE BOTTUM Executive Director 9.4% of Rev
SARAH TAYLOR Board President
CHRISTOFFER MASI Board President
NANCY KUHN Secretary
EDIE SELLARS Treasurer
TARA ALLEN Board Member
MIKE HANNLEY Board Member
PENNY SMITH Board Member
KAREN SYKES Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA HODGE EXECUTIVE DI 10.4% of Rev
HOLLY WIELKOSZEWSKI Board President
NANCY KUHN Secretary
WHITNE DONEEN Treasurer
BEVERLY FERGUSON Board Member
SARAH TAYLOR Board Member
MONIQUE KLEINHANS Board Member
KAREN SYKES Board Member
KAROL FONTEYNE Board Member
KYLE STETLER Board Member
DAX VANFOSSEN Board Member
JEANNETTE ROSENBERG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in MT for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.