Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 23.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 20.4% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jane Clark Board President —
Brooke Wiseman Board President —
Teresa Muir Board President —
Christian Axelsen Treasurer —
Meg Goodman Secretary —
Tom Althoff Board Member —
Susan Chou Board Member —
Sean Danielson Board Member —
Susie Frausto Board Member —
Gary Greene Board Member —
Jenny Hull Board Member —
Harleen Kaur Board Member —
Lynn LaPlante Board Member —
Beth Lopez Board Member —
Jane Martin Board Member —
Ruthanne Rehfeldt Board Member —
Susan Siska Board Member —
Julie Somogyi Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Don Potoczny Board President —
Lisa Ciota Board President —
Teresa Muir Secretary —
Tracer Chow Treasurer —
Christian Axelson Board Member —
Denise Axtell Board Member —
Meg Goodman Board Member —
Gary Greene Board Member —
William Jastrow Board Member —
Harleen Kaur Board Member —
Michael ONeill Board Member —
Ruth Ann Rehfeldt Board Member —
Jim Zubik Board Member —
Sean Danielson Board Member —
Brooke Wiseman Board Member —
Susie Frausto Board Member —
Birjan Crispin Board Member —
Jane Clark Board Member —
Jenny Hull Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Don Potoczny Board President —
Cherilyn Murer Vice President —
Lisa Ciota Board President —
Tracer Chow Treasurer —
Teresa Muir Secretary —
Denise Axtell Board Member —
Meg Goodman Board Member —
Gary Greene Board Member —
William Jastrow Board Member —
Harleen Kaur Board Member —
Michael ONeill Board Member —
Lisa Sallstrom Board Member —
Jim Zubik Board Member —
Sharnell Weathersby Board Member —
Brooke Wiseman Board Member —
Susie Frausto Board Member —
Birjan Crispin Board Member —
Jane Clark Board Member —
Jenny Hull Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHARON ASHER-HALL Board Member —
DENISE AXTELL Board Member —
SHELLEY CAMPBELL Board Member —
TRACER CHOW Board Member —
LISA CIOTA Board Member —
MEG GOODMAN Board Member —
GARY GREENE Board Member —
WILLIAM JASTROW Board Member —
TERESA MUIR Board Member —
CHERILYN MURER Board Member —
MICHAEL O'NEILL Board Member —
GLENN SROKA Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 377 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points below the peer median (30 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.